Slasher Films: An International Filmography, 1960 Through 2001 |  | Author: Kent Byron Armstrong
Publisher: McFarland & Company
Category: Book
List Price: $75.00
Buy New: $72.47
as of 11/21/2009 13:30 MST details
You Save: $2.53 (3%)
New (7) Used (6) from $72.47
Seller: internationalbooks
Rating:  2 reviews
Sales Rank: 2227184
Media: Hardcover
Pages: 376
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.8
Dimensions (in): 10.5 x 7.1 x 1
ISBN: 0786414626
Dewey Decimal Number: 791.43655
EAN: 9780786414628
ASIN: 0786414626
Publication Date: July 2003
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The slasher film genre got its start in the early 1960s when acclaimed filmmakers such as Alfred Hitchcock and Michael Powell made provocative mainstream film such as Psycho and Peeping Tom, but it is most associated with the late 1970s and the releases of Halloween and Friday the 13th. They have been frightening and thrilling audiences ever since with their bloody scenes and crazed killers. Over 250 slasher films are presented in this work. Entries provide major cast and production credits, a plot synopsis, and a short critique; interesting production notes are often provided. Some of the films covered include Alice, Sweet Alice, American Psycho, The Burning, Cherry Falls, Curtains, Deep Red, Frenzy, Hide and Go Shriek, Maniac, Prom Night, Scream, Sleepaway Camp, Slumber Party Massacre, and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. Filmographies are provided for slasher directors, actors, writers, and composers.
|
| Customer Reviews:
 A welcome addition, but pretty cold-blooded. February 7, 2004
John David Felter (New York (Ripper))
6 out of 9 found this review helpful
After the entertaining but disappointing 'Going To Pieces' I was thrilled to pick this Slasher reference up, hoping it would be a deeper, more thorough examination of my beloved sub-genre. What a let down! Long-winded synopses, terse criticisms, and several glaring omissions made for a boring, frustrating read. Why in the world would one devote most of their text to lengthy, uninvolving plot descriptions when they have the chance to either sing a film's praises or unleash a scathing criticism? Rockoff's 'Pieces',though thin, was at least a pleasurable, nostalgic read by someone who clearly knows his stuff. Armstrong never really lets on as to whether he's into this stuff or not, and while that's not essential, it's clearly more fun to know. So, the second of two noble trys is a let down as well. Perhaps a book with the color and flavor of Rockoff's, and the width and depth of Armstrong's, would be what we Slasher-buffs need.
 Rather pointless February 4, 2004
Jarrett B. Graver (Baltimore, MD)
6 out of 8 found this review helpful
I wanted to like this book, really I did. Big props to McFarland for even comissioning a second study of the slasher genre after their good, if distressingly slim, Going to Pieces. The problem here is the lack of a critical commentary. After a brief overview of slasher film history and conventions, the majority of the book consists of long, boring plot synopses (spoilers and twist endings included) followed by one or two lines of lame "production notes" and the author's overall opinion of the film's worth. For $65, I was hoping for much more than rote recitation of slasher film plots. Where are the intriguing behind-the-scenes stories from Adam Rockoff's "Going to Pieces"? Where is the kind of excellent, in-depth analysis found in another McFarland book, John Kenneth Muir's eminently worthwhile "Horror Films of the 1970s"? Pretty much a washout, I'm granting an extra star for good intentions. The slasher genre still yearns for a comprehensive study...let this be the clarion call!
|
|
|
